Author: Bordier, H.
Title: Les actualtés médicales. Les rayons N et les rayons N1.
Description: Paris, J. B. Baillière, 1905. Small 8vo (18.1 x 13.4 cm). 95 pp., several text engravings. Printed boards. = After the discovery of X rays by the German physicist Röntgen, and their eminent use in medical, chemical, and physical sciences, the search for "new rays" accelerated. Soon, the French scientist Blondlot discovered the N rays, this to the great joy of the French nationalists who saw Röntgen's discovery as German victory, and wanted to get even. "In 1903, Blondlot, a distinguished physicist who was one of eight physicists who were corresponding members of the French Academy of Science, announced his discovery while working at the University of Nancy and attempting to polarize X-rays. He had perceived changes in the brightness of an electric spark in a spark gap placed in an X-ray beam which he photographed, and he later attributed to the novel form of radiation, naming this the N-rays for the University of Nancy. Blondlot, Augustin Charpentier, Arsène d'Arsonval and approximately 120 other scientists in 300 published articles claimed to be able to detect N-rays emanating from most substances, including the human body with the peculiar exceptions that they were not emitted by green wood and by some treated metals. Most researchers of the subject at the time used the perceived light of a dim phosphorescent surface as "detectors", although work in the period clearly showed the change in brightness to be a physiological phenomenon rather than some actual change in the level of illumination. Physicists Gustave le Bon and P. Audollet and spiritualist Carl Huter even claimed the discovery as their own, leading to a commission of the Académie des Sciences to decide priority. The "discovery" excited international interest and many physicists worked to replicate the effects. However, the notable physicists Lord Kelvin, William Crookes, Otto Lummer, and Heinrich Rubens failed to do so. Following his own failure, self-described as "wasting a whole morning", the American physicist Robert W. Wood, who had a reputation as a popular "debunker" of nonsense during the period, was prevailed upon by the British journal Nature to travel to Blondlot's laboratory in France to investigate further. Wood suggested that Rubens should go since he had been the most embarrassed when Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany asked him to repeat the French experiments, and then after two weeks Rubens had to report his failure to do so. Rubens, however, felt it would look better if Wood went, since Blondlot had been most polite in answering his many questions. In the darkened room, Wood secretly removed an essential prism from the experimental apparatus, yet the experimenters still said that they observed N-rays. Wood also secretly replaced a large file that was supposed to be giving off N-rays with an inert piece of wood, yet the N-rays were still "observed". His report on these investigations were published in Nature, and they suggested that the N-rays were a purely subjective phenomenon, with the scientists involved having recorded data that matched their expectations. By 1905, no one outside of Nancy believed in N-rays, but Blondlot himself is reported to have still been convinced of their existence in 1926" (from Wikipedia). The present work, completed June 1904 but not published before 1905, is in fact one of the last stands of Blondlot. On the other hand, it may also be seen as the starting point of a new quack science so dearly wanted by many patients and (pseudo-) physicians. Stamp on front board, front flyleaf and page 31, spine chipped, some dampstaining to the lower margin of front and back boards, otherwise a good complete copy. Very rare.

Keywords: